Thank you for your response and noble (if socially naive) pursuit of truth / honesty. To be honest (in return), the main intent of my post above is to inform c

Thank you for your response and noble (if socially naive) pursuit of truth / honesty. To be honest (in return), the main intent of my post above is to inform critical readers about the mentioned pandemic simulation that was carried out in October of 2019, and allow them to consider for themselves what that implies. Just informing / expanding the conversation. What people think about BG is irrelevant to me, I just saw that it was the topic being discussed here. :) *edit: also I deliberately took the extreme stance/tone (TRUST BILL) because it seems obviously absurd and contradicts bigger picture critical thinking. Speculative tone (which would've been more honest) is always rejected as weak. So I say "Trust Bill, because x," when I actually want to say, "are you aware of x?" By taking a stance I'm being dishonest and inflammatory but generating discussion / thought and hopefully avoiding censorship and outright dismissal due to existing biases. Sole intention is to expand the overton, generate thought / discussion / awareness of fact. No one else in these comments brought up E201 and many likely haven't heard of it, but it is worthy of consideration and some may find it interesting!