3 ms·
Note that these are results for aerosolized bacteria that tend to hang in the air. The new coronavirus is only spread via droplet transmission, which would make
by ummonk 7y ago
Note that these are results for aerosolized bacteria that tend to hang in the air. The new coronavirus is only spread via droplet transmission, which would make even rudimentary masks way more effective.
TL;DR of the results though: homemade mask filtered ~50-70% and surgical mask ~90-95%. Homemade mask reduced transmission into the air by ~75-80%, surgical mask by ~85%.
- chrischen 7y agoI’d imagine at least some of the advice against buying masks is to prevent hoarding and a supply shortage where they are needed most: healthcare workers.
- jmrko 7y agoThat's a bad argument against DIY masks though. I tend to also agree with Zeynep Tufekci in this matter: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/opinion/coronavirus-face-masks.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/opinion/coronavirus-face-...
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- adolfojp 7y agoThe masks can be counterproductive if used without discipline or training. It's not uncommon to see people adjusting their masks and scratching underneath them constantly. The masks are transformed into virus concentrators and rebreathers.
- goodside 7y agoAre you aware of any studies on this specifically? Sounds very plausible but hard to weigh against the benefit of catching expelled droplets. I imagine the calculus changes depending on age, and whether your primary concern is preventing your own infection vs. transmission to others.