3 ms·
> And as part of a settlement, they are prohibited from publicly naming him. That would be a non-starter for me. I think I would burn about half my net worth t
by oh_sigh 7y ago
> And as part of a settlement, they are prohibited from publicly naming him.
That would be a non-starter for me. I think I would burn about half my net worth to let the world know about a scumbag on the level of "J".
- awinder 7y agoI’m a bit ratted by their inability to press criminal charges. They got a lot of hard evidence and I’d be really amazed if someone crazed enough to do this is going to be an outstanding citizen for the rest of their life. There’s a public interest in that person being named, having this history attached to their name, and restitution to be paid.
- DangitBobby 7y agoI was just thinking... the state pays ungodly amounts of money to put away criminals. How is this different? Why are these two financially on the hook for justice to be served?
- bigtones 7y agoTwitter thread identified him from court filings: https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1240497113177391104 https://mobile.twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/124049711317...