> We opened our eyes to find that not only did we not need as much In terms of Keynesian economics, it has nothing to do with need, rather that allowing invest

> We opened our eyes to find that not only did we not need as much In terms of Keynesian economics, it has nothing to do with need, rather that allowing investors to "keep" and reinvest produces more overall growth and thus tax revenue as other taxation schemes. Sad and difficult, but according to Keynesian interpretation, these donations during trying times are likely an economic detriment in the long term.