4 ms·
There are not plans for such an event. Such plans are inherently unpalletable. The right answer would be murder 90% of the population to sustain the resources
by anonuser123456 7y ago
There are not plans for such an event.
Such plans are inherently unpalletable.
The right answer would be murder 90% of the population to sustain the resources for the 10% during the recovery.
How many people are game for that?
- SllX 7y agoWell you probably don’t need a whole 10% to murder the other 90%.
- anonuser123456 7y agoMy point is... If you have enough foodstore for X% of the population to make it through the 5-10 year period of crop failure, but can't do that if you try to feed 100% of the people what do you do? I choose the 10% and continuity of civilization over 100% and complete destruction of society. And if I'm in the 90% .... I'll be pissed, but what needs to be done must be done. In WW2 sailors sealed themselves up below the waterline to save the ship at certain doom to themselves. The universe is an ugly place... But to see the light of humanity possibly extinguished is a worse prospect for me personally.