No, he was replying to @antirez request of "Check yourself in the git history". I don't think anybody is insinuating anything here. The same solution to a comm

No, he was replying to @antirez request of "Check yourself in the git history". I don't think anybody is insinuating anything here. The same solution to a common problem has been found independently. This happens all the time (See the Erlang process model and the Actor model e.g.). Down the line, this isn't even important. Can we move along now and build some awesome databases?