3 ms·
A test might have a high false positive rate, ie “low specificity”, but can still have “high sensitivity”. That would mean that while you catch most cases of t
by dschuler 7y ago
A test might have a high false positive rate, ie “low specificity”, but can still have “high sensitivity”.
That would mean that while you catch most cases of the virus, you’d also get a bunch of false positives. Flipping a coin as a hypothetical test would give false positives and negatives, or low specificity and low sensitivity.
- prepend 7y agoIsn’t false negative specificity and false positive sensitivity? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_and_specificity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_and_specificity
- boyd 7y agoNo, sensitivity is TPs / all positives (detected TP and FN). It’s the green half of the diagram in your link. The language is very easy to get tripped up by though. :)
- prepend 7y agoI think I’m getting tripped by false positive, true positive. A test with high sensitivity will have a low false positive rate. A test with high specificity will have a low false negative. So having a test with high sensitivity but low specificity will result in trust in the positives, but not trust in the negatives?
- dschuler 7y agoFor me it’s easier to think of sensitivity as being “sensitive to the true positive” without saying much about false positive or negative. A sensitive test will catch many positive cases. It may or may not have false positives though, eg a test that’s always gives the right answer vs a test that always returns positive no matter what. A specific test will give you few positive results when the true answer is negative. You could use it to rule something out. One test might say “patient has A or B condition”, and a second test with high specificity may then rule out A or B, leaving B or A, respectively, as the probable condition.