3 ms·
We have 1000 confirmed cases when most people who have symptoms can't get tests to confirm whether they have it. That is a long way from having only 1000 cases
by btilly 7y ago
We have 1000 confirmed cases when most people who have symptoms can't get tests to confirm whether they have it.
That is a long way from having only 1000 cases at present. We are at a significant multiple of that. Estimates of Wuhan at a similar point suggest that they had 7x official figures. We are likely about 5000-10000 in reality.
Now what is the growth? Here is a trivial sanity check. From https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-cases/#case-tot-outchina https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-cases/... on a log scale it is clear that reported cases worldwide have been growing by a factor of 10 every 2 weeks. Projecting that out for 8 weeks starting with 1000 gives you 10 million. Starting with our likely 5000-10000 we hit all of California. At which point the limit is not that exponential growth doesn't get us there, but rather that the exponential curve hits saturation and breaks down. At which point you fit to other models based on past epidemics to get an estimate of where it tops out.
Now 63% is in line with projections we've seen for weeks. That's 25 million people. if we believe the recent Lancet estimate that the fatality rate is 0.5-1.5% of people who get it, that is 1.25-3.75 million dead Californians. If we believe more conservative estimates, that's still a lot of dead people no matter how you slice it.
- jacquesm 7y ago> that is 1.25-3.75 million dead Californians You are in error there. California has about 40 million people, 0.5 to 1.5% of 40 million is 200K to 600K. Mind you, that is still a lot of dead people, and that is just California, and assuming the health care system isn't going to be overrun in which case the 1.5% might be conservative.
- zaroth 7y agoA good basic sanity check is to look at the log-graph of total cases in any given country, not the whole world. Take Italy for example. You’ll see immediately the growth is not a constant exponent. Nor would even simple theoretical models expect it to be. It’s a logistics curve, or “S” curve, which means the exponent starts out at the highest value (once it takes off) and then is constantly decreasing over time. What that looks like in the logarithmic charts is a line which starts at a high slope and flattens over time. See, for example: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/ https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/italy/