2 ms·
Ad free-ish at the Sac Bee: https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.html https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.htm... If 5
by vearwhershuh 7y ago
Ad free-ish at the Sac Bee:
https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.html https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavirus/article241349341.htm...
If 56% of CA is infected in 2 months then we aren't being told something about this virus.
- xenocyon 7y agoNewsom's CA estimate is roughly the same percentage as the nationwide estimates by the CDC: "Between 160 million and 214 million people in the United States could be infected over the course of the epidemic" (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/us/coronavirus-deaths-estimate.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/us/coronavirus-deaths-est...)
- vearwhershuh 7y agoI don't know where you live, but where I live they have issued a shelter in place order and my understanding is that this is widespread. If 56% of the state gets the virus under a shelter in place order, either we all already have it or the virus is so virulent that even limited runs for essentials is extremely risky.
- WalterSear 7y agoNewsom's statement qualified that the calculations did not take shelter-in-place into account.
- threatofrain 7y agoSo are several hundred thousand people going to die in a short period if time? Doesn't that mean martial law?
- WalterSear 7y agoIt's already being discussed.