3 ms·
I’d rather see 60-144hz before any increases in resolution above 1080p and maybeeee 4K. I think lower quality rips show themselves a bit more on high quality p
by Bnshsysjab 7y ago
I’d rather see 60-144hz before any increases in resolution above 1080p and maybeeee 4K.
I think lower quality rips show themselves a bit more on high quality playback devices, but I generally don’t hit low quality releases purely for Snob factors so I could be wrong.
- dylz 7y agoAre movies actually made in 144 FPS?
- kodt 7y agoNot that I'm aware of. The only high FPS movie I know of is Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk by Ang Lee, it is shot at 120fps. The Hobbit is shot at 48fps.
- Bnshsysjab 7y agoNo, and that’s my point. 144hz is probably overkill, but 60hz is a noticeable difference.
- gowld 7y agoMovies look like garbage in >30fps. That's why moviemakers beg audiences not to do frame interpolation.
- Bnshsysjab 7y agoInterpolation and frame rate are two different things. Care to give an argument more than ‘looks garbage’? I think people reported that the hobbit looked weird, but that’s likely because were used to 30fps in a subconscious level.
- tripzilch 7y agoI don't know how much films you watch, but the only thing I'm used to on a subconscious level is what the world looks like IRL.