5 ms·
> Ms. Ciresi’s most recent post on GitLab’s public thread, published five days ago, has been redacted by the company. Would you happen to have her post? Kind o
by dependenttypes 7y ago
> Ms. Ciresi’s most recent post on GitLab’s public thread, published five days ago, has been redacted by the company.
Would you happen to have her post? Kind of amusing how they talk about valuing transparency when they censored her post.
- relaunched 7y agohttps://m.imgur.com/a/grRvEWt https://m.imgur.com/a/grRvEWt
- blanche_56 7y agoWell that does seem hysterical. I wonder what kind of overlap exists between those who have been panicking about "Russian hackers" for the last four years and those who now believe that reluctance in allowing remote Russian developers access to potentially sensitive or valuable US code bases is "racist".
- luckylion 7y ago> allowing remote Russian developers access to potentially sensitive or valuable US code bases is "racist". You do realize that GitLab is open source, right?
- httpsterio 7y agoyes, the issue wasn't access to the source of gitlab, but customers who host their closed source code on gitlab.
- rndgermandude 7y agoWhile their code is open source, the data and metadata in their hosted repositories belonging to their customers/users a lot of times is not.
- andrepd 7y ago>remote Russian developers access to potentially sensitive or valuable US code bases What do you mean by this exactly?