3 ms·
Anyone here uses Mathematica besides Physics or pure mathematics? I mean is it worth using the machine learning from Mathematica or Tensorflow is better? Is i
by superflit 7y ago
Anyone here uses Mathematica besides Physics or pure mathematics?
I mean is it worth using the machine learning from Mathematica or Tensorflow is better?
Is it better to use integer optimization solvers or then Mathematica?
In which ways you are using Mathematica and Really leveraging it?
Sorry for my question but I think and suspect I am missing something bigger.
Will be glad if someone Illuminate me.
And please be free to PM if your project is discreet.
- dagw 7y agoDepends how wide your definition of 'physics' is. We have a couple of environmental scientists at work that use it to model water pollution for example. The big win is that they can basically just type in their differential equations exactly like they would write them on paper and have the answers simply pop out.
- b215826 7y ago> Anyone here uses Mathematica besides Physics or pure mathematics? My adviser (a physicist) uses Mathematica for all non-physics computations as well. It's a clunky language for general purpose computation and doesn't play well with external programs and libraries. The user experience on Linux can also be quite haphazard with frequent crashes and lack of good HiDPI support (I haven't used version 12.1). It's also hard to run headless programs written in Wolfram language. But if you're okay doing everything inside the Mathematica GUI and don't care about the fact that it's a walled ecosystem, don't have a preferred text editor, and don't particularly care for Unix's one-thing-well philosophy, Mathematica might work for you.