Hahahah it's like people just ignored all the awesome philosophy from radical skeptics. Max Stirner, the most radical skeptic of them all, is without a doubt a

Hahahah it's like people just ignored all the awesome philosophy from radical skeptics. Max Stirner, the most radical skeptic of them all, is without a doubt a more interesting philosopher than many others one is forced to read. Moreover, contrary to the claim made by the OP - he expects the reader to have read philosophy from other authors. A radical skeptic like Stirner loves Kant and Hume. Maybe it's because Kant shows that the "thing-in-itself" is unknowable even if it exists and Hume shows us that empirical observation is basically all we have for trying to work with the world. Both show that no one in science has found anything resembling truth