That study is actually quite myopic, and focuses entirely on non-pharmapseutical treatment. It specifucally ignores most of the findings we have now: - 25-50

That study is actually quite myopic, and focuses entirely on non-pharmapseutical treatment. It specifucally ignores most of the findings we have now: - 25-50% infected show no symptoms - herd immunity is ignored - Non-vaccine treatments are ignored - Reinfection is assumed, yet we have no data yet because there havent been any reinfections yet - It flatly assumes full quarantine is possible at home Definitely read the study and weigh your own data and conclusions with these points in mind rather than using his summary. This guy just got scared from it, but he's just a social science historian, not a doctor or microbiologist.