3 ms·
It's not just a bad idea... it's a horrible, dangerous idea. All of their points can be easily addressed with a static site generator or just some CMS that lets
by brabel 7y ago
It's not just a bad idea... it's a horrible, dangerous idea.
All of their points can be easily addressed with a static site generator or just some CMS that lets you write pages using templates instead of just pure HTML. That's absolutely declarative, a lot more than a JS-framework based app. The only point that would be missing is the reactive part as you mention: but who the hell expects a wiki to be reactive?! I expect it to be as close as possible to the printed version! A Wiki is NOT a web app!
- otterlicious 7y ago> a static site generator You really think 140,000 people are going to learn git all of a sudden?
- Fnoord 7y agoLearning Git (there are GUIs for it as well) can aid one in so many additional ways though.