3 ms·
Given it took Whitehead and Russell 300 pages to logically prove that 1 + 1 = 2, I think we can all go ahead and assume any supposition stated in less detail is
by russellbeattie 7y ago
Given it took Whitehead and Russell 300 pages to logically prove that 1 + 1 = 2, I think we can all go ahead and assume any supposition stated in less detail is naturally flawed and incomplete, including this one.
- Rerarom 7y agoIn foundations of math that mathemati ians actually use (such as ZF), you don't need 300 pages to show 1+1=2.
- russellbeattie 7y agoLogically, that makes sense, but since this thread is about logic, not math, it doesn't. (Unless you're saying logic and math are the same, in which case I would need to see a rigorous proof in order to believe you.)