The author is inventing HTML6 on their own. This is not something official. The "Express tags" example links to nowhere and first time ever I hear about it (I'm

The author is inventing HTML6 on their own. This is not something official. The "Express tags" example links to nowhere and first time ever I hear about it (I'm a web developer). Also, "dialog" element is clearly part of the HTML5 (5.2 exactly) spec and not HTML6. "Introducing cachable libraries in HTML6 will be a step towards improving the productivity of both web designers and users." WHAT?! No. Nothing here makes sense. Libraries you're using have been cached in the browser since... Before I started doing web development. So I'd say ignore this article. Seems to be some sort of viewgrab. Edit: Author is asking "HTML6 release date?" which shows that this author might not even be a web developer, as they show signs that they have no idea on how the process works or what the HTML specifications really are. Edit2: How does trash like this get updated in the first place? Any web developer would look at this article and recognize it as non-sense. Are people blindly upvoting titles without even opening the page and skimming the content?