4 ms·

1/500 dead for all 20-40yo even with medical intervention is not a small cost...

• tonyedgecombe 7y ago
  Exclude the vunerable in that age range and it would be much lower.
  • onion2k 7y ago
    "If you ignore some of the deaths then the number is lower" is an odd response. Why would you exclude vulnerable people?
    • johncolanduoni 7y ago
      Assuming they know they’re vulnerable they presumably wouldn’t go to these parties. However that’s quite an assumption, particularly among young people.
      • im3w1l 7y ago
        You could have screenings beforehand.
    • odkamkfn 7y ago
      Because shutting down the economy will kill people, too. It will also decrease quality of life for everyone, and disrupt families, communities, cities and countries. I don't even know what the best course of action is, but there are trade-offs that a lot of people here seem to be ignoring.
  • serpix 7y ago
    Exclude the [non-people] in that age range and it would be much lower. We are all humans. All life is sacred.
    • ramblerman 7y ago
      I'm pretty sure OP meant, exclude them from going to the party. Not exclude the statistic