3 ms·
My favorite style of marketing is when your users market your app for you. NOT in the way you might think (not through referral programs, emailing friends, etc.
by spencerfry 16y ago
My favorite style of marketing is when your users market your app for you. NOT in the way you might think (not through referral programs, emailing friends, etc.) rather that they're encouraged to share their profile, page, website, etc., because it will benefit them directly. In turn it benefits you, but it starts with benefiting them.
What's an example? KickStarter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Foursquare, etc., are all examples of this. Another is Carbonmade. Artists must share their portfolio (e.g. http://colerise.carbonmade.com/ http://colerise.carbonmade.com/) with their friends, recruiters, etc., to get benefit from it and in turn those friends (usually other artists) see the Carbonmade link at the bottom of the portfolio, click it, and can then sign up for their own. It sets off a viral chain.
Side note: We're seeing nearly as many referrals from Facebook as we are from Google, because people are sharing their portfolios on Facebook as their homepage. Screenshot: http://cl.ly/0a372w1T3y3G1s2U3337 http://cl.ly/0a372w1T3y3G1s2U3337 And look at StumbleUpon's comeback!
- derefr 16y agoThis is only effective for apps where the content the user puts into the app is put in with the intent of sharing it in the first place (i.e. this isn't a marketing technique, so much as an app-design technique.) You can't just pick a random app in a different vertical (say, Gmail) and tack viral own-data sharing onto it.
- spencerfry 16y agoCertainly, but gmail has the @gmail.com to market for them. :)
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- fezzl 16y agoThe baked-in vs. bolt-on social issue has been explored by Jason Cohen, and I agree with him that baked-in virality is more effective than bolt-on virality. However, consider also that Dropbox's referral program is a bolt-on social feature.