2 ms·
I initially found the article’s attitude against the Fed’s noted actions surprising, but slowly a bias from the author surfaced, particularly after I started se
by LordOfWolves 7y ago
I initially found the article’s attitude against the Fed’s noted actions surprising, but slowly a bias from the author surfaced, particularly after I started seeing phrases like “toxic waste” and “a secret from the American people”. I am not saying Wall St. and/or/nor the Fed’s actions (or lack thereof) were correct for the time (2008), but this seemingly personal vendetta does not make for a valuable, objective piece of journalism. The author even notes herself as “an outspoken critic“ on the About page [1].
[1]: https://wallstreetonparade.com/about-3/about/ https://wallstreetonparade.com/about-3/about/
- thulecitizen 7y agoI don’t believe objective journalism exists, unless you are somehow able to represent all 7 billion human perspectives. If you think you are not neutral, or if you have to think about to check if are harming anyone, then there is a high chance that you are the dominator/oppressor [1]. [1] https://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/imperialism.html https://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/imperialism.html