4 ms·
Stackpath is cheaper on bandwidth, mostly because of scale. For video based applications, this is a big deal (and we work with video companies to try and get be
by mrkurt 7y ago
Stackpath is cheaper on bandwidth, mostly because of scale. For video based applications, this is a big deal (and we work with video companies to try and get better bandwidth pricing). For typical web app servers, bandwidth is usually not a very large expense.
CPU based pricing is pretty close. We've heard our CPUs are higher performance, but haven't done any real testing. The people who run high CPU apps on us _tend_ to pay less because we scale up and down so quickly.
- byteshock 7y agoThank you for your reply. Your deployment seems to be a lot more streamlined and simpler than Stackpath at the moment. That just might be the deciding factor for me and other developers! I wish you and your team the best of luck!