4 ms·
> The 1% rule is often misunderstood to apply to the Internet in general, but it applies more specifically to any given Internet community. ... only 23% of the
by Hokusai 7y ago
> The 1% rule is often misunderstood to apply to the Internet in general, but it applies more specifically to any given Internet community. ... only 23% of the population (rather than 90 percent) could properly be classified as lurkers, while 17% of the population could be classified as intense contributors of content.
This is something important to take into account. I can be a lurker in Hacker News but a top contributor in my towns gardeners forum.
Any given person has a maximum time that can dedicate to lurk or contribute. But, one hour of lurking has way more coverage than one hour of contributing. e.g. I can read Reddit, Hacker News, and Wikipedia and still have time left to eat breakfast. But, I want to contribute a new Wikipedia article, probably I will need that complete hour or even more. So, I just contribute to 1 community while lurking in the rest.
- LMYahooTFY 7y agoReally good points. Anecdotally; this also seems to correlate roughly to my personal lurk : contribute ratio. I consume far more than I put out.
- blaser-waffle 7y agoUnless you're a paid online marketer / shillbot, or maybe some sort of journalist / blogger, I suspect this is true for everyone on the intrawebs.
- smichel17 7y agoI had a longer reply that I was going to post, but then it got longer and more nuanced than I wanted to spend the time to type out, so I discarded it instead. I do this quite frequently. This is not directly related to your comment (although the comment I didn't post was), but it's another interesting personal observation to add to the pile.