3 ms·
Example with made up numbers: Google Software Engineer I - 100 total jobs, 2000 applicants (click here for a breakout by region). Based on historical data and
by keenmaster 7y ago
Example with made up numbers:
Google Software Engineer I - 100 total jobs, 2000 applicants (click here for a breakout by region). Based on historical data and the current applicant pool, you have a 8% chance of scoring an interview if you apply to [All Locations] and 5% if you apply to Mountain View only.
Aerojet Rocketdyne Inc. Software Engineer I - 10 total jobs, 150 applicants (Sacramento only). Based on historical data and the current applicant pool, you have a 20% chance of scoring an interview.
I know that withholding such statistics is advantageous for the employer and maximizes the number of applications. However, my question is directed more at job platforms like LinkedIn. At most, they only show the number of applications. When I apply, I don't have the faintest idea whether I'll get a response or whether my application will go into a black hole. I believe a more applicant-friendly job platform, which publishes more statistics, aggressively penalizes outdated/lame listings, and incentivizes updates from the employer will attract more applicants. Those applicants will in turn attract more companies, so on and so forth.
The job search grind is a major unsolved problem. Unless you have the most fungible skillset and level of experience, applying to jobs is soul crushing. We don't even have read receipts for resumes. There are so many low hanging fruit which haven't been touched by the major job platforms. People are not opposed to long job applications. What is deeply problematic is that there doesn't seem to be a correlation between the length/redundancy of a job application and your chance of getting a callback. With ML, it doesn't seem impossible for LinkedIn to modify its platform such that it can give you reasonable assurance as to your chance of getting a callback. Solving this issue will be nothing more of revolutionary. It would single-handedly make the economy more dynamic. I'd love to hear an informed take on this issue though, maybe I'm missing a key constraint.