"Computer science" is NOT science. Good science is rarely done outside of machine performance issues. How to organize information to be best "digested" by human

"Computer science" is NOT science. Good science is rarely done outside of machine performance issues. How to organize information to be best "digested" by human programmers and users is largely in the realm of psychology and physiology, which are "soft" sciences because we don't really know how the human brain works yet. I've been in long debates about this and stand by it. Somebody once challenged a "pro science" claimer to "prove" that go-to's are objectively worse than nested blocks. The science claimers failed to produce objective evidence. (Background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Considered_harmful, see the part about Edsger Dijkstra's paper.) (I'm not saying goto's are good, only that my preference for blocks is subjective. For one, nested blocks can be indented which makes their structure more visual. Goto's don't have a visual counterpart, at least not without a fancy IDE.)