3 ms·
Here's a potential explanation quoted by Matt Levine in his March 13 newsletter: “The risk in the current environment is that sustained illiquidity of the UST
by gniv 7y ago
Here's a potential explanation quoted by Matt Levine in his March 13 newsletter:
“The risk in the current environment is that sustained illiquidity of the UST market … could cause leveraged UST investors to reduce their Treasury positions on a large scale. This would essentially result in a Treasury ‘supply shock’ as these funds reduce their positions & force dealers to sell those positions in a very illiquid market. Significant position reduction from one large leveraged UST investor would likely lead to a cascading effect whereby U.S. Treasury yields rise sharply and force liquidations from other similar investors. This would worsen conditions for dealers to intermediate risk in the U.S. Treasury market, exacerbate the rise in U.S. Treasury yields, and further cheapen Treasuries.”
- SilasX 7y agoBut haven't the Fed's constant injections (like the recent $0.5/1.5 trillion one) indicated it's going to keep the Treasury market liquid by buying them all up at par?