3 ms·
VB.NET's only purpose should have been 99% compatibility with VB6. Instead, it was too much like C# to be compatible and too much like VB6 to be consistent. I
by wvenable 7y ago
VB.NET's only purpose should have been 99% compatibility with VB6. Instead, it was too much like C# to be compatible and too much like VB6 to be consistent.
I had lot of experience with VB6 back in the day but I moved straight to C#.