No, I've given credible reasons for two orders of magnitude: 1. The majority of the documents you are including are not reasonably considered web standards 2.

No, I've given credible reasons for two orders of magnitude: 1. The majority of the documents you are including are not reasonably considered web standards 2. Of those that are, you are counting each one 5-50 times. That's two orders of magnitude. All your analysis has proven is that it's (ironically) difficult to machine-parse the w3 data, and that you did so in a way to justify your preconceptions.