3 ms·
Read up on DeMorgan’s law.
by layoutIfNeeded 7y ago
Read up on DeMorgan’s law.
- thaumasiotes 7y agoDe Morgan's law isn't the right one for this. You want the identity ∀x.P(x) ⟺ ¬∃x.¬P(x). ∀x.P(x) is obviously true when the universe is empty -- no counterexamples exist. ∃x.P(x) is obviously not true in that case -- no examples exist.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- maweki 7y agoThat is De Morgan if you expand the quantifiers.
- thaumasiotes 7y agoYou have to make some assumptions if you want to "expand the quantifiers". In particular, you have to assume that the universe is non-empty, which is a really bad idea if you're commenting in this thread.