3 ms·
Fossil (https://www.fossil-scm.org https://www.fossil-scm.org ) has an interesting approach to this problem - integrate bug and work item tracking, project wiki
by hyperrail 7y ago
Fossil (https://www.fossil-scm.org https://www.fossil-scm.org ) has an interesting approach to this problem - integrate bug and work item tracking, project wikis, and source control, but make them all distributed, so that there is not a single master copy of the bug database or the docs wiki.
It attempts to solve both the cultural challenge (bugbase written by a different company/team from the source control, imposing 2 different styles on you) and the technical one (bugbase and source control don't talk to each other, and so bugs and checkins are not linked).
- spockz 7y agoDoesn’t Gerrit (https://www.gerritcodereview.com/ https://www.gerritcodereview.com/) do the same? At least for changes. Not sure about reporting issues.
- int_19h 7y agoIf only Fossil weren't so opinionated... I love the idea of bundling everything in the repo, and not averse to SQLite database as the storage format. But there's no way to edit history, even for commits that don't exist anywhere other than your own local repo - because the author considers rebase an anti-pattern.