4 ms·
It's more a question of "proper" filtering, not "no" filtering. For instance, if a PhD program only accepted white male applicants, we'd find that unacceptable
by kristopolous 7y ago
It's more a question of "proper" filtering, not "no" filtering.
For instance, if a PhD program only accepted white male applicants, we'd find that unacceptable. If instead, they only accepted people with proper credentials, scores, and recommendations, we'd find that fine. It's not no filter, just the right one.
Similarly, if we were making a movie about Jim Crow segregation and needed actors to play white racist men then our same unacceptable filter all of a sudden looks reasonable.
So it's not about removing filters, it's about making them justifiable and relevant. That's why we say "there's no reason that a qualified X can't be a Y", that part, the reason part, is important.