> Disabled people certainly don't want to be part of that classification but there's no subjectiveness when it comes to their disablement. You'd be surprised.

> Disabled people certainly don't want to be part of that classification but there's no subjectiveness when it comes to their disablement. You'd be surprised. Being disabled is a spectrum just as being ugly is. It's not just perfectly healthy people vs people missing entire limbs. It's also the person with moderate chronic pain who can do anything they like but not everything they like. And then there's the whole other subjectiveness that comes from bureaucrats having to classify people into discrete buckets based on how disabled they are. Sure you can't raise your arms above parallel, but does that qualify you for 4C coverage and not just 3D?