3 ms·
Realistically, everyone in the house with an infected person is going to catch it. You’re breathing the same air if nothing else.
by empath75 7y ago
Realistically, everyone in the house with an infected person is going to catch it. You’re breathing the same air if nothing else.
- aksss 7y agoDidn't some study recently say that in China a key practice for containment was removing infected family members from households and placing them in quarantine? I'm a little skeptical of self-isolating in a home with other people. You're all in it together at that point. I'm not sure "everyone in the house will catch it", but probably everyone will be exposed.
- freeqaz 7y agoCOVID-19 CDC guidelines recommend droplet precautions[0], which means that the disease doesn't spread via the air. It spreads via droplets when you cough/sneeze. It's still bad, but it does mean that sharing air isn't a hazard by default. If it was airborne, they would recommend different precautions[1]. [0]: https://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/prevention_control/en/ https://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/preve... [1]: http://www.wikidifference.com/difference-between-airborne-and-droplet-precautions/ http://www.wikidifference.com/difference-between-airborne-an...
- alexanderchr 7y agoSurprisingly not. This virus is acting really strange. > The household secondary attack rate was 15% https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.03.20028423v1 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.03.20028423v...
- IAmGraydon 7y agoThat’s a perfectly normal secondary attack rate, in line with both flu and H1N1. Why do you say that it’s acting strange?
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- chillwaves 7y agoYou could set up some fans to exhaust from the room and create negative air pressure.