2 ms·
Approximated perhaps, but I would argue that in evaluation it is subjective because it is always compared to something else. The issue abstracts to determinism
by ganzuul 7y ago
Approximated perhaps, but I would argue that in evaluation it is subjective because it is always compared to something else.
The issue abstracts to determinism vs. infinite and unbounded physical entropy because we can't separate ourselves from the system. Decoherence and mixing of quantum 'information' is part of the puzzle, and I would like to claim processes of convergence are another.
It becomes difficult to not overload terms while discussing this topic.
- yters 7y agoThere are certainly limits to formal definitions of information, but I see them as lower bounds on semantics, such that we can identify meaningful as that which passes the bounds. Doesn't guarantee true negatives, but at least gives us true positives, so is a sufficient if not necessary criteria for meaning.