If you read the virological.org link, the first comment is from a Japanese team that independently reached the same conclusion as Tang et al. I've seen a bunch

If you read the virological.org link, the first comment is from a Japanese team that independently reached the same conclusion as Tang et al. I've seen a bunch of scientists who will nitpick any Chinese paper to bits. Mostly older scientists. In the case of this virus, the need to publish before the usual review means there are guaranteed to be flaws. The Glasgow call to retract was a pretty aggressive way to go after the people who know the most about the virus but couldn't prove everything they had learned.