4 ms·
I'm on mobile so I don't have time to collate a bunch of sources for something you could search for online, so here's a link to a summary. NOTE: before you dis
by allovernow 7y ago
I'm on mobile so I don't have time to collate a bunch of sources for something you could search for online, so here's a link to a summary.
NOTE: before you dismiss the source, notice that it is merely a commentary on a collection of individual sources that you can verify yourself. Now I do not agree with the conclusion in the link below, that this is a deliberate bioweapon, but there is ample circumstantial evidence here to at least presume that the virus could have leaked from the only level 4 biolab in China, which happens to be less than 10 miles from Wuhan. It's likely they were conducting legitimate research, all I'm pointing out is that the evidence for this actually coming from China is pretty good.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/did-china-steal-coronavirus-canada-and-weaponize-it https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/did-china-steal-coron...
- pinewurst 7y agoI fail to see how a link to a Russian disinformation site represents trustworthy sources.
- allovernow 7y agoThey have collected legitimate reports from e.g. the news. It's no less legitimate than a bunch of links on a Wikipedia page. Don't be lazy and dismiss this because you don't like the political leaning of zerohedge. >Russian disinformation site But we're just going to believe everything out of China without a second thought right now? Everything in that link, all the suspicious relationships, all the published research (arrested smugglers have published on coronavirus very recently) is verifiable. Don't be lazy.
- dang 7y agoPlease don't do this here.