4 ms·

Well, it COULD mean the end of this browser, which i would not call a big loss, as it was always outdated and the makers ripped out vital security features like

Well, it COULD mean the end of this browser, which i would not call a big loss, as it was always outdated and the makers ripped out vital security features like sandboxing or they have been unable to implement Mozilla implemented tor based privacy fixes! It is better that the fans are learning WHAT COULD HAPPEN - because if they would not learn the truth, they are suddenly sitting around with a dead and even more outdated browser. This is too important than to ignore it or not to post about it.

smnthermes 7y ago
> ripped out vital security features like sandboxing Fake news. Firefox had sandboxing (that was the excuse for deprecating XUL/XPCOM) before Chrom* and Electrolysis: 1. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Security_best_practices_in_extensions https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Sec... 2. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Displaying_web_content_in_an_extension_without_security_issues https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Dis... 3. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Interaction_between_privileged_and_non-privileged_pages https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Archive/Add-ons/Int...