3 ms·
This doesn't really explain your position on why you don't just buy/rent $50 worth of movies per month. edit: I don't have Spotify or Apple Music. Can you expa
by dfxm12 7y ago
This doesn't really explain your position on why you don't just buy/rent $50 worth of movies per month.
edit: I don't have Spotify or Apple Music. Can you expand on this without putting it in terms of those services?
- saagarjha 7y ago> This doesn't really explain your position on why you don't just buy/rent $50 worth of movies per month. Isn’t their position that they’d like this thing to exist? I don’t see how you need to have a Spotify or Apple Music account to understand the argument.
- dfxm12 7y agoWhat "thing"? You can currently buy or rent whatever you want and watch it. I haven't found anything on a streaming service that isn't also for sale/rent somewhere and have found things for sale that are not available on streaming services. If you want access to "_everything_", and are willing to pay a premium over existing services, buying/renting what you want is available today. Problem Solved, no?
- saagarjha 7y agoOnline?
- 1_player 7y agoFlat fee. All you can eat. I don't want to do the cost-benefit analysis of "do I want to spend $X for this movie?". I can afford it, I'm not counting pennies, but when I see a price figure I spend a few seconds deciding whether it's worth it or not, and sometimes the answer is NO. On subscription services you just click and enjoy. I'm already paying for it, the answer is always YES. But there's a limit. I will not pay for 10 different services at $9.99/mo to have access to 70% of the movie repertoire. No way in hell.