>> So now they gets taxed twice? >I don't understand this argument. I've seen it so many times among a certain crowd of people, but I still don't get it. Weal

>> So now they gets taxed twice? >I don't understand this argument. I've seen it so many times among a certain crowd of people, but I still don't get it. Wealth tax makes no sense because if you earned that money, then you have already paid taxes on it. Taxing assets/stocks makes no sense because the value is constantly changing. One day you could have millions and the next you could be broke. Plus, if you had zero cash on hand, you would have to liquidate an asset just to pay the taxes on it? > Sure, an omnipotent being that knew all outcomes in advance could set a perfect single-tax rate for each person's individual circumstance that only affected their income. A flat tax would work fine too, and be the most "fair". > taxing wealth as a correction I don't think the main purpose of taxation is redistribution. Who says there needs to be a correction in the first place? I don't think people really care about equality, because no one cares about the inequality of the rich vs. the super rich. They care about the lowest end, and if they have at least enough to support themselves. Which if you're making under a certain amount and have kids you pay basically zero taxes. In fact, you may even get money from the government.