> What you're saying is that your personal "principle" is more important that facts. What uk_programmer's original argument was that even if it worked, even if

> What you're saying is that your personal "principle" is more important that facts. What uk_programmer's original argument was that even if it worked, even if we could afford it, it would be wrong to make uk_programmer work for $5000/mo. and then take $1000/mo. of their money and give it to someone else. Having a factual discussion about the implementation may be interesting, and may be worth discussing, but the argument has already been laid out on moral grounds. If you're going to continue answering the "How?" question and ignoring the "Why?" question, you're going to keep finding that you're talking across purposes from the GP. (BTW, I think your "factual" case is severely flawed as well, but that's a story for another time.)