> It would allow you to be jailed when you make a decision that gets people killed or causes some other significant harm. This is incredibly nebulous. All deci

> It would allow you to be jailed when you make a decision that gets people killed or causes some other significant harm. This is incredibly nebulous. All decisions involve tradeoffs. One or two people die because of a decision to go with one car brake over the more expensive? If "increasing greenhouse gases" significant harm? Good luck ever trying to make anything - there will be a non stop line of people trying to sue the executives of any company they don't like.