4 ms·
Unfortunately that will be really tough. I have a live audio background and the recommendation I have always heard is to keep the latency of your signal path a
by djaque 7y ago
Unfortunately that will be really tough. I have a live audio background and the recommendation I have always heard is to keep the latency of your signal path at the 1 ms level when dealing with monitoring applications. That's a solid order of magnitude below what is common for VOIP let alone video. You could maybe get away with audio only, but round trip latency is still getting up there.
Edit: I know of some pro-grade point to point audio solutions that are able to handle this problem, but I'm unsure if there's anything consumer ready.
- j88439h84 7y ago> keep the latency of your signal path at the 1 ms level NYC->LA at the speed of light in a vacuum 4000 km / c = 13 ms Slower in fiber; apparently about 19 ms.
- cactus2093 7y agoWow 1 ms seems fast. I don’t do any live sound, but I’ve read that 10ms is touted as the cutoff point below which most humans can’t detect any latency.
- pbowyer 7y agoHave you any experience with http://cleanfeed.net/ http://cleanfeed.net/ or https://ipdtl.com/ https://ipdtl.com/ or squadcast.fm? I'm assuming they are good for interviews because you can correctly merge the separate audio tracks later, rather than because they keep the latency down?
- kermitime 7y agoI'm not familiar with any of these but I'm going to check them out. Thank you!
- kermitime 7y agoThanks for the pro-level reference. I'll keep this in mind in case we ever get into recording. For now we're just trying to get non-singers/total beginners to sing together without fear of embarrassment.