> That Defendants be enjoined from infringing the Asserted Patents, or if their infringement is not enjoined, that Defendants be ordered to pay ongoing royaltie

> That Defendants be enjoined from infringing the Asserted Patents, or if their infringement is not enjoined, that Defendants be ordered to pay ongoing royalties to Labrador for any post-judgment infringement of the Asserted Patents; I'm trying to figure out what on Earth could make the first approach appear like a sane course of action to anyone. Apart from reeking of evil it's not like they have their own production line ready to go - they'd get nothing from it. Lawyers being lawyers playing hardball and forgetting what time it is while PR dozed off? Obviously they have to assert the patents however bullshit they may be, but goddamn. (Yes, the stupidity basically irks me more than anything else)