4 ms·
> that would imply we're going to need to quarantines for a few weeks every few weeks for, what, a year? More? There's no way this action is sustainable. That'
by ohazi 7y ago
> that would imply we're going to need to quarantines for a few weeks every few weeks for, what, a year? More? There's no way this action is sustainable.
That's exactly what it implies (or a continuous lockdown for months). It may seem like a crazy proposition today after a century of life being relatively tame, but WWII lasted six years.
This is what we're facing. We're in survival mode through the end of the year. It is crazy, but we'll get through it.
- artursapek 7y agoA virus that probably has about the mortality rate of the common flu is not comparable to freaking WWII
- closeparen 7y agoWhat besides a total war has prompted a shutdown of all non-essential businesses?
- baby 7y agobesides the French president just announced "we are at war".