3 ms·
A layoff is not necessarily temporary. You’d need a system that compels the company to hire them back at their previous wages / benefits, or not allow any kind
by mlthoughts2018 7y ago
A layoff is not necessarily temporary. You’d need a system that compels the company to hire them back at their previous wages / benefits, or not allow any kind of “terminated” status but just transfer payroll (at a reduced rate) to the government.
Firing + collecting unemployment is not the same as requiring fiscal responsibility, not even in terms of superficial intentions.
- alkonaut 7y agoThese Norwegian ones are temporary and surrounded by a lot of regulation. Effectively the employer doesn’t provide any tasks nor any pay, but doesn’t end the employment. It’s a suspension of employment rather than an ending. Such a suspension obviously only has any meaning in a situation where being employed actually brings security. For example, the company can’t hire other people.