4 ms·
I clicked the link and closed the tab the second I saw it was from Brave. They put out an anti-Google piece pretty much every other week, and they rarely have a
by drusepth 7y ago
I clicked the link and closed the tab the second I saw it was from Brave. They put out an anti-Google piece pretty much every other week, and they rarely have any substance. This one might (someone who isn't jaded by their track record can probably tell you in the comments here), but I'd be surprised.
They just want you to use their browser instead of Chrome's, and constant attacks on Google/Chrome is their primary marketing strategy (35 mentions of Brave on-page, Brave branding everywhere, giant "Download Brave" button at the end of the page, etc).
- ehsankia 7y agoThe irony is that their entire business would not exist if it wasn't for Google developing and open sourcing Chromium, yet they seem hell-bent on destroying the very hand that feeds them.
- jjeaff 7y agoIsn't Firefox also open source? Google isn't the hand that feeds them because of chromium. It's the hand that feeds them because of Google's privacy track record. If they weren't so invasive, then there would be no reason for brave to exist.
- ehsankia 7y agoWell then why didn't they use Firefox as their base?