4 ms·

Even if it is legally questionable (not sure it is, I'm not a lawyer) what jackass would bother suing over it? This is a completely reasonable order given the

Even if it is legally questionable (not sure it is, I'm not a lawyer) what jackass would bother suing over it? This is a completely reasonable order given the emergency situation. No reasonable person should object to it. (I did not downvote you)

KozmoNau7 7y ago
History shows that whenever you ask "what kind of jackass would do this?", a number of such jackasses tend to present themselves. Don't underestimate contrarianism and people's willingness to fight tooth and nail for what they believe in, no matter how ridiculous it may seem to you.
enitihas 7y ago
Not sure about the legal validity here, but you can be sure somebody would find time and energy to take this to court. I don't think however, that any court would rule to swifty declare this illegal and then be deemed somewhat responsible for the consequences.
hfern 7y ago
Someone who is prosecuted for violating this will fight it, as they will have the most firm standing.
jahlove 7y ago
This sounds like exactly the kind of thing ACLU would fight. And their twitter suggests they will: https://twitter.com/ACLU_NorCal/status/1236722627000975361 https://twitter.com/ACLU_NorCal/status/1236722627000975361
- notJim 7y ago
  That is related to people coming off cruise ships being quarantined, where they are actually confined. This order is different, because you are still allowed to leave your house for essentials, exercise, etc. Not saying whether it's legal/illegal/good/bad/whatever. Just noting that it's a different scenario.
SomeHacker44 7y ago
Even if it is ruled unconstitutional, it could take a very long time to happen, and in the meantime, the effect could be beneficial to society. Look at how long it took the Japanese internment from WWII to be ruled upon - and that was by modern standards not remotely beneficial to society.

4 ms·

Even if it is legally questionable (not sure it is, I'm not a lawyer) what jackass would bother suing over it? This is a completely reasonable order given the

by earthtourist 7y ago

KozmoNau7 7y ago
History shows that whenever you ask "what kind of jackass would do this?", a number of such jackasses tend to present themselves. Don't underestimate contrarianism and people's willingness to fight tooth and nail for what they believe in, no matter how ridiculous it may seem to you.
enitihas 7y ago
Not sure about the legal validity here, but you can be sure somebody would find time and energy to take this to court. I don't think however, that any court would rule to swifty declare this illegal and then be deemed somewhat responsible for the consequences.
hfern 7y ago
Someone who is prosecuted for violating this will fight it, as they will have the most firm standing.
jahlove 7y ago
This sounds like exactly the kind of thing ACLU would fight. And their twitter suggests they will: https://twitter.com/ACLU_NorCal/status/1236722627000975361 https://twitter.com/ACLU_NorCal/status/1236722627000975361
- notJim 7y ago
  That is related to people coming off cruise ships being quarantined, where they are actually confined. This order is different, because you are still allowed to leave your house for essentials, exercise, etc. Not saying whether it's legal/illegal/good/bad/whatever. Just noting that it's a different scenario.
SomeHacker44 7y ago
Even if it is ruled unconstitutional, it could take a very long time to happen, and in the meantime, the effect could be beneficial to society. Look at how long it took the Japanese internment from WWII to be ruled upon - and that was by modern standards not remotely beneficial to society.