3 ms·
The Greek Data Protection Authority provided some guidance on online tracking last month. In particular, the following was called out explicitly as a non-compli
by lmkg 7y ago
The Greek Data Protection Authority provided some guidance on online tracking last month. In particular, the following was called out explicitly as a non-compliant practice:
> In the event of rejecting trackers, the user is constantly invited to make a new choice through a
pop-up window, while the same does not apply if the
user accepts trackers, in which case their choice is
maintained for a longer period.
https://iapp.org/resources/article/cookie-guidance-from-greece/ https://iapp.org/resources/article/cookie-guidance-from-gree...
That's not necessarily same context, but the main point still stands: By law, if you're invoking "consent" as the legal basis for collecting and processing data, consent must be freely given and as easy to withdraw as to provide. Provoking people to change their mind from "no" to "yes" but not the opposite is not considered to be freely-given.
- rmrfstar 7y agoBrave placed "Tweet this" buttons next to 5 bullet points on its page. In this setting, how could they conform to the consent standard you have articulated? Is the default opt-out (no tweet) enough? Must they offer a "tweet this" for some countervailing argument? If so, which argument?