3 ms·
> high bumpers are death for pedestrians The typical counter-argument to that involves some sort of abuse of the notion of freedom. (Not endorsing, of course,
by Florin_Andrei 7y ago
> high bumpers are death for pedestrians
The typical counter-argument to that involves some sort of abuse of the notion of freedom.
(Not endorsing, of course, just mentioning it.)
- HenryBemis 7y ago"People are stupid" is not a valid argument to move towards a solution. "Developing and establishing Standards, training appropriate authorities and giving them the right tools/equipment to measure/identify violators, legislate appropriate fines" is. Hand anyone who does this a $1000 fine, and see how fast the whole country falls in line.
- naravara 7y agoThere is the adage about freedom ending at the point my fist meets your face. In this case, I guess it's more about where my face meets your windshield.