> He adds that the law "should also specify that the payments would continue in 2021 and beyond if the unemployment rate rises to 5.5% and remains there or high

> He adds that the law "should also specify that the payments would continue in 2021 and beyond if the unemployment rate rises to 5.5% and remains there or higher. Hopefully this will not happen, but if it does, the money will be needed." If it has this caveat, it's essentially just UBI, not a response to coronavirus. I'm more sympathetic to UBI than I'd have once expected, but my observation is that any response that creates a potential post-virus entitlement is substantially less likely to pass, and at the moment, the priority should be getting some relief out there. This is suboptimal, but reality.