3 ms·
The difference in effectiveness is huge, to the point where it's ridiculous to be healthy and wear a mask. Like I said, they don't put masks on surgery patients
by marcus_holmes 7y ago
The difference in effectiveness is huge, to the point where it's ridiculous to be healthy and wear a mask. Like I said, they don't put masks on surgery patients.
And don't forget the social signal part; if everyone wears a mask all the time, then we don't know who actually considers themselves to be infectious. Whereas if just the infectious people wear masks, then we know who they are and can act appropriately (being grateful that they self-identified as infectious and kept the rest of us safer, for a start).
- tasuki 7y ago> The difference in effectiveness is huge, to the point where it's ridiculous to be healthy and wear a mask. I think the point is that you have no idea whether you're healthy.
- marcus_holmes 7y agoI get that. But still, if you're going to not wear a mask all the time, then better to wear one when you think you're sick than when you think you're healthy.
- dmwallin 7y agoI think the social signal part has second order effects that make it work out not as you would expect. If ONLY sick people tend to wear masks then masks will make you a more visible target of fear and hate, which would lead people who are sick to not wear masks. It's a much better idea to destigmatize the act of mask wearing so we can get larger coverage of sick people with mask s.
- marcus_holmes 7y agoin the West, yes. Because we're idiots about this sort of thing. In Asia, the feeling is gratitude - thank you for wearing a mask and protecting me from your illness